Adt Vs Protect America Security – Which One Is Best For You?

Home security systems have come a long way in recent years, with smart technology on the rise. These days, there’s a lot of information to take in when you’re looking for the best system for your home. What kind of services can you expect for your expenditure? The better-rated systems can be pretty costly, after all.

ADT and Protect America are both popular choices for homeowners across the country. They have a few differences which we’ll look at here, to help you make a choice between the two.


ADT Security Features


ADT is probably the best-known security company in the world. After all, they’ve been around since 1874!

Their popular Pulse system is secure, modern, and sophisticated, but it doesn’t come cheap – and you won’t be able to install it yourself.


They have their own team of installers, and charge you accordingly. You’ll also pay a monthly maintenance cost on top of your monitoring fees.


ADT is still growing their home automation portfolio, but you can expect a responsive and easy-to-use system. You can even sync it up with your Smart Watch.


ADT has 24/7 monitoring, just like Protect America and other security companies – but they also have 24/7 customer service, unlike most other service providers. You might pay more, but you’ll get more peace of mind.  


If you want to quit your ADT service while you’re still under contract, you’re obliged to pay ADT 75 % of whatever monthly fees you would still owe up until the end of your contract period. Put it this way: signing a contract with ADT is like a marriage that’s great while it lasts, but the divorce settlement is a real eye-opener.


ADT Pros and Cons




  • ADT’s customer service hotline is open for 24 hours a day, 7 days a week.
  • They offer a very long trial period, so you can decide if you like their services.
  • ADT offers a great range of equipment and apps for ease of monitoring and control.



  • ADT is one of the most expensive providers on the market.
  • You’ll be required to sign a three-year contract – and it has a heavy termination penalty.
  • ADT has its own installers – no DIY option available.

Protect America Security Features


Protect America has a selection of service packages to suit your needs and budget.

They supply all the equipment and you set it up yourself – no installation team in your house, and no setup fees required.  


Protect America’s service packages will give you 24/7 monitoring and home automation, and they have their own mobile app that lets you access the system remotely. The same services come with each package, and the prices depend on how much equipment you want.


Protect America systems come with a 3-year contract and a 60-day termination clause. On the upside, you’ll get your equipment without any upfront fees, and you won’t have to replace or repair it yourself.


Protect America Pros and Cons



  • You can install and configure the system easily by yourself.
  • You don’t need to pay any installation or monthly maintenance fees.
  • You can choose between landline, broadband or cell connectivity.


  • Protect America doesn’t supply outdoor cameras.
  • Protect America’s contract is for a minimum of three years, and they have a 60-day notice of termination.


*Article written by and was published with permission from – original article published here.


Frontpoint Vs Protect America Security: Which Is Better?

If you’re shopping around for home security companies, they all seem pretty similar at first glance. However, you might be surprised to learn that the perfect home security system for one household could be completely wrong for someone else.

Most companies will offer you the basics – security equipment, monitoring, and dispatch of emergency services if needed. The difference comes when you want a system that’s tailored to your specific needs. Perhaps you want the most affordable monthly monitoring system out there, or a system that connects you even in a remote rural area.

Two of the highest-rated home security companies are Frontpoint and Protect America. Keep reading to find out what each company is best at, and which system is right for you!

Frontpoint Security Features

Some home security systems consist of DIY setups that let you keep tabs on your home, but it’s up to you to monitor the action and call the authorities if your alarm is tripped. These systems are the least expensive. A Frontpoint home security system sits smack in the middle of this range: you install the equipment yourself, and the company provides 24/7 monitoring. All their packages come with either a one-year or three-year contract.


  • Frontpoint security systems are easy to install yourself.
  • The package options and extra equipment are reasonably priced.
  • You can choose optional indoor or outdoor cameras.
  • You can use Frontpoint to set up home automation with certain packages.


  • You’ll have to sign up for a long-term contract – and they’ll check your credit rating to determine your fee level.
  • You’ll need a top-tier plan to view live and recorded video.
  • There’s no landline connectivity option available.


Protect America Security Features


Protect America’s service packages all offer break-in monitoring, home automation, and remote access via their mobile app. Their package prices depend on the type of equipment you need – the more you’re willing to pay per month, the more equipment you’ll get.

Protect America supplies the wireless home security equipment that comes with the package you’ve selected. You’ll have to set it up yourself, but don’t worry about getting out the toolbox – the equipment is easily attached with adhesive patches.


You’ll have to sign up for a three-year contract, and you’ll be billed monthly. Make sure you read over your contract carefully – most bad online reviews for Protect America are based on contract disputes!


Protect America offers the option of monitoring your equipment over a landline, the internet, or cell network. The least expensive package uses your existing landline, while cellular and broadband monitoring options are more expensive.


With Protect America, you don’t own the equipment. This is good news for some homeowners, as it means they’ll replace or repair your equipment if it fails.


  • Protect America offers price matching for any other quote you get – if it has the same features and length of the contract.
  • The system is easy to install and configure, even with limited DIY or tech skills.
  • No up-front fees are required.
  • You get highly responsive sensors and 24/7 monitoring.
  • You have a choice between landline, broadband or cellular network connectivity.


  • Protect America doesn’t supply outdoor cameras.
  • Their sales pitch is pretty aggressive – make sure you know what they offer before signing up.
  • They work on a three-year contract with a 60-day termination clause.

*Article written by and was published with permission from – original article published here.



Vivint Vs Protect America Home Security Systems Review

Home security and home automation are available at the touch of a button these days. You can easily control any aspect of your home remotely, as well as have detailed alerts sent to a 24-hour monitoring company.

What’s not so easy is deciding which home security system offers you not only peace of mind, but also the sophisticated automation features you want. Affordability is also a big factor for many homeowners.

If you’ve narrowed your search down to either Protect America or Vivint, we can help you make your choice!

Vivint Security Features

Vivint smart home systems come at a premium price, but once you’ve decided on a plan, you can sit back and relax. Vivint sends its technicians to your house to install everything and show you how it all works.

You can control the Vivint system remotely using the Android and iOS apps provided for free.  You’ll be able to see how many doors and windows are open, and which doors are unlocked. You’ll be able to lock and unlock your doors remotely, and arm or disarm your system as you please. Home temperature control is also a feature of some of the packages – a remote thermostat can save you 10-12% savings on heating and 15% savings on cooling per year.

One of the best features of Vivint’s system is the HD doorbell camera, with a 180-degree view and a 10-foot night vision range. This is great for monitoring who’s at your door or porch gate. You can communicate with a two-way system, and record any activity. Those notorious porch pirates, intent on stealing your delivered packages, had better beware!

Vivint will get you to sign a 3.5 to 5-year contract, which is one of the longest in the home security industry.


  • Vivint offers one of the best video doorbells on the market.
  • The home automation features are pretty advanced
  • You’ll have full communication with every part of your house – no more yelling from the top floor into the basement!


  • A basic equipment setup can cost you upwards of $800 in total.
  • You have to sign up for a lengthy contract.

Protect America Security Features

Protect America has a range of packages with varying features and levels of functionality. Their offers are all DIY – you install the equipment yourself (with help from customer support if you need). You save on setup and maintenance fees.

The hub of your security system is the Touchscreen Control Panel that connects all your smart home devices. You’ll be able to monitor all of your sensors, and control the temperature in the house. You can also arm or disarm your system with the control panel.

Protect America gives you 24/7 monitoring, and their own mobile app that lets you access your system remotely.

Protect America will get you to sign a 3-year contract with a 60-day termination clause. You won’t own your own equipment – if you cancel your monitoring package, technicians will uninstall your system. But – you also won’t ever have to repair or replace the equipment yourself.  



  • The DIY system means there’s no installation or maintenance fees.
  • Protect America will give you a decent basic system for a reasonable price.
  • You can choose between landline, broadband or cell connectivity.


  • There are no outdoor cameras supplied with a Protect America system.
  • The indoor camera has a pretty limited range of vision.
  • You might get caught unawares with their 60-day termination clause.

*Article written by and was published with permission from – original article published here.


Google Pixel vs. Samsung Galaxy: Which is better for business?

Not all Androids are built the same. Google’s Pixel series of smartphones provides a clean experience, though Samsung’s phones include some business-focused features.

Though the vast majority of features in Android are common to all Android devices, there are a select few optimizations and features implemented by specific vendors, touted as “exclusive features” to differentiate certain flagship products from the rest of the pack. Consumer-facing features are not directly representative of how professionals use phones, however.

Google’s Pixel series and Samsung’s Galaxy Note series are popular options for business users due to the inclusion of several hardware and security features. Here, TechRepublic compares the two to help you decide what’s best for you.

The business case for the Google Pixel series

Google’s Pixel line of phones represents their premium replacement for the Nexus series, which showcased the manufacturing capabilities of various Android device makers, including HTC, Samsung, LG, ASUS, Motorola, and Huawei. Unlike the Nexus series, Pixel phones are not co-branded devices, though they are designed by former HTC staff by way of Google’s 2017 acquisition of part of the once-giant Taiwanese firm.

Primarily, the exclusive features on Pixel devices are limited to hardware-specific functionality—as Google is the platform owner of Android, limiting functionality to their own phones to the detriment of third-party Android OEMs is unlikely to make Google’s Android licensees (or government regulators) happy. The Pixel series is renowned for high-quality cameras, though this provides limited practical benefit for most business use cases. Insurance adjusters are likely to find it useful for taking quick photos of damage while in the field, likewise, private investigators will likely find the Google Lens feature helpful.

SEE: Special report: How 5G will transform business (free PDF) (TechRepublic)

As noted in the Google Pixel 3 review for professionals, “The Pixel 3 and 3 XL, like all Pixel devices, are part of Google’s Android Enterprise Partners initiative, allowing for enterprise deployment with QR codes and zero-touch enrollment. All of the Android Enterprise labeled phones have guaranteed security updates (within 90 days) for 3 years, and at least one major version upgrade in that time as well. The Pixel 3 and 3 XL go several steps further, guaranteeing monthly security updates and version updates for 3 years… ending in October 2021. Practically speaking, this is the most generous and timely update guarantee for any Android phone.”

The price of the Pixel 3 and 3 XL is a bit hard to swallow at $799 and $899, respectively. Google is prepping a comparatively cheaper Pixel 3a and 3a XL for release later this year, with a mid-range Qualcomm SoC.

The business case for the Samsung Galaxy series

The flagship Samsung Galaxy S and Galaxy Note series phones are the best models that the Korean electronics giant has to offer, though Samsung devices still suffer from an inexplicably poor user interface. The One UI receives essentially identical criticism around the blogosphere as the TouchWiz and Samsung Experience before it, as the new UI retains the same usability issues, and phones retain unnecessary feature duplication, as prior generations.

SEE: Samsung Galaxy S10: An insider’s guide (free PDF) (TechRepublic)

Samsung does have the Samsung Knox enterprise security feature, however. Knox is used to separate business and personal data on Samsung phones, preventing the need for users to carry two devices with them. This is fundamentally a feature that is available in Android Enterprise on Pixel and other smartphones, though Samsung’s implementation of the concept is one of the few feature duplications that has a vocal following.

Likewise, Samsung DeX is a feature that allows users to extend their Galaxy smartphones to an external monitor. When paired with a keyboard and mouse, DeX-compatible phones can be used as a desktop computer. While other vendors such as ASUS and Motorola have tried this modality in the past, Samsung DeX is widely regarded as the best implementation of this smartphone-to-desktop transformation. DeX can also be used to run Linux distributions from the phone itself.

The verdict

Both Samsung and Google have seen lower than expected phone sales, according to their Q1 earnings, as competition from mid-market phones have made the increasing price of the premium flagships a relatively difficult sale. Google’s Pixel 3a & 3a XL are likely to help in that regard. Samsung’s mid-range Galaxy smartphones do sell, though are often indistinct from each other considering the volume of different models (often carrier-locked) that are released.

Google’s control of Android does put the company in a good position to offer a longer lifespan of version and security updates, though Samsung’s Knox and DeX are worthwhile features. DeX may not be as useful if you need to carry around a keyboard and mouse, though this does make for one less thing to carry around for business users in airports. Additionally, the conceit does rely on the prospect of having access to a spare monitor. It works for hotdesking environments, though “fear of the unknown” is likely to keep many business users tied to their laptops.

Overall, the Pixel series is an easy choice for developers and security-minded professionals needing the most up-to-date software, while the Galaxy series is well suited for those who want one device to do everything.

Article By James Sanders


Is DDR4 better than DDR3?

DDR3 vs DDR4 Performance

Article originally published At CloudNinjas.

We are serious about server memory upgrades and refurbished memory, which is why we came up with the following topic. The pace of advancement in computing technology continues at a breakneck speed, and most of the time, it’s just a short time before the technology is outdated. There are many components and parts that make up a computer, and RAM is one of them. Thankfully, RAM has a longer shelf life in a computer or a server compared to other types of computer technologies. As we’ve seen with DDR, and DDR2 they’ve been used long past their last dates of manufacture, and we would expect the same for DDR3 and DDR4.

With the first DDR SDRAM rolling out at the turn of this millennium, it took three (long) years before it was replaced by DDR2 SDRAM in 2003. Another quartet of years passed before DDR2 SDRAM was shown the door with DDR3 SDRAM as the replacement. Everything was silent for seven years before the next revision of DDR RAM, known as DDR4 SDRAM, came into the picture as the latest champion for computer memory. In this context of server memory, we look at the big question: “Which is better: DDR3 RAM or DDR4 RAM?”

Timeline of DDR Memory Types


DDR4 RAM improvements

First of all, let us take a closer look at what kind of improvements have been made to DDR4 SDRAM. In terms of its physical form factor, DDR4 SDRAM shares a similar width as that of DDR3 SDRAM, although it is a slight bit taller in height by approximately 0.9mm.

The main difference between the two in their physical form factor would be the number of pins found in DDR4 SDRAM and DDR3 SDRAM. The former has 288 pins, while the latter carries 240 pins, with both of them being in a different location. Apart from that, DDR4 SDRAM carries pins that are not in a straight line but remain slightly curved where it has its middle bit extend farther compared to the pins that are located on the end, giving the module a slight rounded look on the bottom.

DDR4 Memory Stick

DDR4 Memory

We would like to cap it off by listing four main improvements made to DDR4 SDRAM that has allowed it to ascend to the top of the computer memory hierarchy at the moment. They are none other than having a lower operating voltage, better power saving enhancements, a higher frequency, as well as better chip density.

Its predecessor, DDR3 SDRAM will run at 1.5V natively where its low power modules will run at 1.35V. Of course, depending on the manufacturer, some of them might be adventurous enough to venture beyond the parameters specified in order to boost the level of performance (overclockers and hardcore gamers are also another group who are willing to push the envelope in order to gain more performance mileage). However, it is safe to assume that most DDR3 SDRAM will run at the specified voltage.

When it comes to DDR4 SDRAM, things are different. DDR4 SDRAM will run at 1.2V natively where its low power modules will run at a mere 1.05V, which is surely a vast improvement compared to its predecessor. Think also of the amount of power that you will be able to save in the long run when it comes to a server setting. Not only that, DDR4 SDRAM is also full well capable of supporting a number of power saving enhancements that will include a deep power-down mode that will further lower the amount of energy consumption even when the system remains in standby. Another advantage of having a lower operating voltage and power enhancement features would mean the DDR4 SDRAM needs less power to operate, and of course, will operate at a cooler temperature as opposed to DDR3 SDRAM.

Performance-wise, DDR4 SDRAM begins at 2133MHz and is estimated to achieve speeds of up to 4266MHz. With DDR4 SDRAM chips being manufactured to sport densities of up to 2GB per chip, this makes it boast double the density of its predecessor. In other words, ordinary consumers should be able to see 16GB DDR4 SDRAM in a single stick format and up to 64GB on a single stick when it comes to server-grade memory.

DDR4 SDRAM has its flaws, too

To put it simply, perfection has not been achieved in DDR4 SDRAM just yet. One of the main stumbling blocks when it comes to using DDR4 SDRAM would be cost, as its memory sticks are tipped to be up to 50% costlier compared to an equivalent DDR3 SDRAM memory stick. However, history has shown that over the course of time, DDR4 SDRAM will be more affordable with an accompanying uptick in its adoption.

DDR3 memory stick

DDR3 Memory

The higher frequency at which DDR4 SDRAM operates also works against it since timings would be looser. In other words, we see that DDR4 will most probably not run any faster compared to DDR3 SDRAM for the moment. We expect things to change when higher frequency DDR4 SDRAM hits the market with a tighter sense of timing though.

Some servers using DDR4 memory from Dell, HP, and Supermicro

Dell DDR4 memory

Dell is happy to note that its DDR4-based Dell PowerEdge servers with Dell DDR4 memory will often lead to a significant performance increase over their DDR3 systems.

The Dell PowerEdge systems that are current for DDR4:

Dell’s claim to this is backed by test results which show how an increase in memory will automatically increase the level of system performance, productivity, as well as efficiency. This would encompass the ability for the server to be able to run additional programs at one time, especially those programs that are very graphics intensive while speeding up the computer response time which will also reduce the number of performance lags. Security software, database applications, as well as business programs, will be able to find the inclusion of such Dell memory to be a boon.

HP DDR3 vs. DDR4 memory

The DDR4 memory architecture that can be found in HP ProLiant Gen9 servers run on E5-2600 v3 or v4 series processors. Some of these improvements comprise of having additional memory channels per processor – 4 in total. There is also an increase of its maximum memory speed of 2133 MT/s, and when push comes to shove, it can support up to 3200 MT/s as new processor models are unveiled. Needless to say, it is best to use HP memory on HP’s own ProLiant servers to minimize incompatibility and performance issues.

The HP Proliant systems that are current for DDR4:

  • ProLiant DL20 G9, G10
  • ProLiant DL60 G9
  • ProLiant DL80 G9
  • ProLiant DL120 G9
  • ProLiant DL160 G9
  • ProLiant DL180 G9
  • ProLiant DL360 G9, G10
  • ProLiant DL380 G9, G10
  • ProLiant DL560 G9, G10
  • ProLiant DL580 G9, G10
  • ProLiant ML110 G9
  • ProLiant ML150 G9
  • ProLiant ML350 G9

The DDR3 memory architecture that can be found in HP ProLiant Gen8 servers that run on E5-2600 v2 series CPUs. The improvements over the older DDR2 systems comprised of having additional memory channels per processor – 4 in total. There is also an increase of maximum memory speed to 1600 MT/s, and when push comes to shove, they can support up to 1866 MT/s as new processor models are unveiled. Needless to say, it is best to use HP memory on HP’s own ProLiant servers to minimize incompatibility and performance issues.

Supermicro DDR4 memory

Last but not least, we have Supermicro memory that has been specially designed to cater for the newest high-performance systems that are on the market. Each of their memory modules has been validated before rolling out of the factory and is also Supermicro certified as a seal of quality when it comes to performance and reliability. The hallmarks of Supermicro memory would be higher frequencies, a greater degree of bandwidth as well as improved power consumption that ought to maximize the level of performance on your server.

So, which memory should I get?

It really depends on the system your running at the end of the day. DDR4 memory isn’t compatible with servers built for DDR3, just as DDR3 won’t fit into servers built for DDR2. We would lean toward systems which use DDR4 memory at the moment since it is the latest iteration and will have its kinks worked out in the near future, as well as the power savings which can be when you add up the savings for each stick of memory. In the server memory world, the storage density found on DDR4 memory will definitely work in its favor. So the winner for DDR3 vs DDR4, well it really depends if you’re getting a new system and if you’re willing to pay for the ability to upgrade to the latest speeds as they come out.



Dell Vs. Lenovo: Which laptops are better for business?

Dell unveiled the latest generation of the Latitude series of business laptops. Here’s how they stack up to Lenovo’s ThinkPad lineup.

Dell is making a steady stream of announcements at Dell Technologies World in Las Vegas this week, including among them refreshed models of the company’s Latitude and Vostro notebook computers.

Dell’s Latitude series and Lenovo’s ThinkPad series are popular options for business users due to the inclusion of several hardware and security features. TechRepublic compares the two product lineups to help you decide what’s best for you.

The business case for Dell Latitude systems

Dell’s newly-announced systems bring essentially the same set of features for business-class systems as are available from HP and Lenovo. Among these include aluminum and/or carbon fiber chassis, privacy screen settings to narrow the field of view, fingerprint readers, Windows Hello-compatible IR cameras, and smart card readers.

The aluminum and carbon fiber Latitude 7000 series comprises 13- and 14-inch models, and 2-in-1 12-inch model (Latitude 7200), while the carbon-fiber Latitude 5000 series includes 13-, 14-, and 15-inch models. The budget-focused Latitude 3000 uses the same form factors, without the carbon fiber reinforcement. All use 8th Gen Intel Core processors. The newly-announced models are available starting May 1, with the 7000 series starting at $1,299, the 2-in-1 Latitude 7200 starting at $999, the 5000 series starting at $819, and 3000 series starting at $599.

Compared to Dell’s consumer-facing XPS series, the newest Latitude and Vostro models (correctly) place the webcam at the top center of the screen bezel, avoiding the “nose cam” effect. There is no cover for the webcam, however, leaving users who need to cover the camera reliant on tape or sticky notes, while Lenovo includes the “ThinkShutter” to cover the camera when not in use.

SEE: 16 top laptops for business users in 2019 (free PDF) (TechRepublic)

If you’re working in particularly adverse conditions, Dell’s Latitude Rugged series provides a great deal more protection than is available on Lenovo’s ThinkPad line. While ThinkPads are by no means fragile (more about that later), the Latitude Rugged 5420 is MIL-STD 810G and IP52 certified, and would serve well in environments where these systems are not likely to be handled gingerly. Dell’s Latitude Rugged and Rugged Extreme series are more in competition with Panasonic’s ToughBook series, as there is not quite a direct competitor in among ThinkPads.

The business case for Lenovo ThinkPad systems

Owing to a distinctive design language, the ThinkPad is practically synonymous with “business notebook,” though fans of IBM’s original models are often quick to criticize Lenovo’s stewardship of the brand. Twelve years after Lenovo’s purchase of the ThinkPad business from IBM, some changes have been made, though these typically reflect industry-wide changes in how laptops are designed.

Among these include the use of 16:9 screens, which are often criticized for being designed for media consumption rather than productivity. Though Dell and HP systems use the same screen type, MacBooks use 16:10 screens, while Microsoft’s Surface line of devices adopted 3:2 screens in 2014, similar to Google’s Pixelbook and Pixel Slate systems. Abandoning the seven-row keyboard (with the exception of the ThinkPad 25th Anniversary Edition) has also been a point of criticism.

Dell and Lenovo business-class systems are on essentially equal footing for user serviceability, though the extent to which this is possible has decreased in recent years. The ThinkPad X390 has soldered RAM, as does the 2-in-1 version of the 2018 Dell Latitude 7390, though the standard notebook version of the 7390 has soldered RAM and one SODIMM slot. (Dell’s model number schema leaves a lot to be desired.) For comparison, recent 13-inch HP notebooks including the EliteBook 735 and EliteBook 830 G5 include two SODIMM sockets.

Soldered RAM makes it impossible to upgrade after ordering, and leaves buyers captive to manufacturer’s pricing for RAM, which can often be exorbitant. While this is slightly more forgivable on a 13-inch system, the soldered RAM + single SODIMM combination on the 15-inch T590 is objectionable.

SEE: Beyond the PC: Lenovo’s ambitious plan for the future of computing (cover story PDF) (TechRepublic)

Thankfully, Lenovo does offer the P-series mobile workstation with superior serviceability, with the P52 and P72 including 4 SODIMM slots, 2 M.2 2280 SSD slots, and a single 2.5-inch SATA drive. This expandability does come the cost of weight, as the P52 weighs in at 2.59 kg (5.71 pounds). While this is heavy relative to contemporary systems, it is lighter than older systems with similar expandability-the T510, for example, weighs in at 2.81 kg (6.19 pounds).

The verdict

If you want to make a judgement by sales alone, Lenovo shipped just over 3 million more systems worldwide than Dell did for Q1 2019, giving the company a 23% market share compared to Dell’s 17.7%, according to IDC. Lenovo and Dell-which are ranked 2nd and 3rd, respectively-are the only companies to have year-over-year growth in Q1, while HP Inc., in first place with 23.2% market share, fell by 0.8%. Sales are not everything, however, and the bandwagon effect is not a precisely useful metric.

Linux users are equally well-served by both Latitude and ThinkPad systems, as both officially support Linux, and are among the more popular notebooks among Linux developers.

For users needing expandability, Lenovo’s P-series is a likely best bet, though for rugged use cases, Dell’s Latitude Rugged series is a better fit.

Modern day Dell systems should not be judged by the company’s past faults, while Lenovo’s ThinkPads do not live in the shadow of IBM. Essentially, the differences come down to aesthetics and pricing. If you see one you like, and can grab it in a sale, go for it.

Written By James Sanders